It seems to me that Rubinstein never recorded Rachmaninoff piano concerto 3, and Horowitz never did Chopin piano concertos. Does this mean that both of them thought their playing styles didn't suit some types of works and those were their wise choices not to touch some?

For example, Rachmaninoff 3 needs a lot of skills and passion, which Rubinstein may think he'd better leave it alone, whilst Horowits may think Chopin's concertos were too slow and romantic for him...

1 Answer 1


Rubinstein only recorded three pieces by Rachmaninoff: his Prelude in C# minor (Op. 3, No. 2), the Second Piano Concerto (Op. 18), and the Rhapsody on a Theme by Paganini (Op. 43). So it's more likely that Rachmaninoff was simply not part of his repertoire; whereas Chopin was well-established as his bread and butter. Rubinstein also recorded more concertos in general than did Horowitz.

Horowitz, on the other hand, recorded a great deal of Chopin, just not his concertos, which are generally seen as secondary works within Chopin's overall piano output. But he recorded a fair bit of Rachmaninoff, with whom he was close friends. The third concerto, in particular, had a special place in Horowitz's repertoire, being the subject of his first recording.

Another possible issue is that Rachmaninoff (b. 1873) and Rubinstein (b. 1887) were rough contemporaries; whereas Rachmaninoff was already a well-established performer and composer by the time Horowitz was born (1903). Rubinstein and Rachmaninoff, to a certain degree, would have been competitors (as performers), Horowitz idolized Rachmaninoff, but Rubinstein's early repertoire would have focused (even more) on composers like Chopin, Brahms, Liszt, and earlier composers like Beethoven.

I don't think it's fair to read much into the pianists' decisions regarding these particular concertos. Factors such as the prior existence of recordings, the timeliness in comparison to other recordings, the opportunities to record, professional contacts and allegiances, and their overall repertorial interests likely played far greater roles than their respective abilities or temperaments.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.