4

Syd Barrett was a founder member of Pink Floyd and was replaced, in 1968, by David Gilmour.

They both were guitarists, singers and songwriters for the band but they might have different writing and playing skills and it has probably influenced the band in various ways.

Can we say that Pink Floyd had different styles with one or other member? How could we describe the style change, from Barrett to Gilmour?

  • 2
    I can't post an answer as I don't know the Barrett era well-enough; to my mind they didn't even begin to get their sound until Ummagumma/Atom Heart Mother - to this day I can only listen to side one of AHM. Side 2 is meaningless to me, side 1 had elements of genius, a hint at the pinnacle they reached with Dark Side/Wish YWH [dammit, now I'm going to have to dig out the early stuff & have another listen ;) – Tetsujin Feb 12 '17 at 18:05
  • 1
    @ tetsujin Wow 2nd side of AHM. i agree with you on side 1, on side 2 Summer 68 ? Proof that Pink Floyd does not belong in any one genre. Alan's Psychedelic Breakfast is quintessential Pink Floyd and is the epitome of psychedelic rock genre. ( contradictory i know but so was Pink Floyd.) Editorial note: i do not believe in genre's. this opinion is worth paper it is printed on. – Alaska Man Mar 13 '17 at 11:05
8

There are a couple differences between the Barrett and Gilmour eras of Pink Floyd. One of the biggest differences was that when Barrett was in Floyd, he was pretty much the lead composer of the band, whereas after Barrett left, composing was more evenly distributed, at least initially. So essentially Barrett-era Floyd was Barrett's band, to the point where Pink Floyd's managers terminated their relationship with Pink Floyd in order to represent Barrett upon his firing from the band, thinking that he'd be more successful. After Barrett left, Pink Floyd became a collaboration between the three original members and Gilmour, until Waters emerged as the main songwriter.

If you take a look at the track listing for The Piper At The Gates Of Dawn, Barrett is the sole composer of 8 of the 11 tracks, and co-composed all but one song, "Take Up Thy Stethoscope and Walk", written by Roger Waters. As noted on Wikipedia, the lyrics to "Take Up Thy Stethoscope and Walk" are markedly different in tone from the lyrics on the rest of the songs on the album.

Its morbid lyrics are quite unlike anything else on the album, the rest of which was penned by Barrett, but is characteristic of much of Waters' work.

So already, even on their first album, there were some differences in sound between Barrett's psychedelic music with whimsical lyrics, and other band members' musical preferences.

This becomes even more apparent on the band's follow up album, A Saucerful of Secrets, where, at least to me, Barrett's only contribution to the album, "Jugband Blues", sticks out like a sore thumb. It has all of the main features of a Barrett song: it's weird, features strange instrumentation, and feels psychedelic. The rest of the album sounds more like spacey progressive rock, again, at least to me.

As the band continued to record albums, they moved further and further away from the psychedelic sound of their early days, moving more towards their progressive rock sound on albums Ummagumma, Atom Heart Mother, and Meddle, until they reached their peak period starting with Dark Side Of The Moon.

So, TL;DR, Barrett-era Floyd was run by Barrett and they played psychedelic rock, while Gilmour-era Floyd was more of a collaboration (until Waters emerged as the songwriting leader) and they played progressive rock.

1

" A Saucerful of Secrets" was really an extension of Barrett-era Floyd. The title track is really just "Nick's Boogie" from 1966, the difference being that Gilmour applied even more effects than Barrett had and the lovely church music ending was really the departure from Barrett=era Floyd, though they never really left that era completely. 1969's "Ummagumma" would have flopped if not for the inclusion of "Astonomy Domine". Though the version is longer, this was typical of Barrett-era Floyd. Long pieces were not something new.

  • Hi and welcome to the site. While this provides useful additional information, it doesn't really directly address the original question. You might edit it to add in an explicit answer, or (when you have enough reputation) post it as a comment instead. – Chris Sunami Feb 19 at 17:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.