Some characteristics of prog that it seems to be missing:

  • Very long songs and solos
    • ✅Okay, so it's almost 10 minutes long, I'll give it that.
  • More jazz or classical influences than blues
    • Time Was is very bluesy, and it doesn't seem jazzy or classical to me, but I'm not a musician
  • Incorporating classical and electronic instrumentation
    • ❌Not at all!
  • Fantasy or otherwise story lyrics
    • ❌maybe a little, but certainly not much

And yet the song seems to be classified as prog. Why?

1 Answer 1


See the wikipedia entry for prog. Folk elements, or blending of influences, and complicated arrangements are also part of the prog thing. The twelve-string intro, CSNY-type harmonies....then a more full-tilt blues-rock section, bluesy guitar solo, power chords and so on - it's quite a complicated song. I know what you mean with your question - I'm of that era and I would not immediately put this song in the prog-rock bucket like King Crimson or Jethro Tull - but then again, the fact that it has different sections in different styles, I could imagine either of those two bands doing this song too...

  • That makes a lot of sense! Thank you :) (also I like your edits to my question, but there's no way to upvote an edit) Mar 23, 2019 at 18:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.